Document Type
Article
Publication Date
11-1-2015
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Determination of clinical outcomes following resuscitation from cardiac arrest remains elusive in the immediate post-arrest period. Echocardiographic assessment shortly after resuscitation has largely focused on left ventricular (LV) function. We aimed to determine whether post-arrest right ventricular (RV) dysfunction predicts worse survival and poor neurologic outcome in cardiac arrest patients, independent of LV dysfunction.
METHODS: A single-center, retrospective cohort study at a tertiary care university hospital participating in the Penn Alliance for Therapeutic Hypothermia (PATH) Registry between 2000 and 2012.
PATIENTS: 291 in- and out-of-hospital adult cardiac arrest patients at the University of Pennsylvania who had return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) and post-arrest echocardiograms.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Of the 291 patients, 57% were male, with a mean age of 59 ± 16 years. 179 (63%) patients had LV dysfunction, 173 (59%) had RV dysfunction, and 124 (44%) had biventricular dysfunction on the initial post-arrest echocardiogram. Independent of LV function, RV dysfunction was predictive of worse survival (mild or moderate: OR 0.51, CI 0.26-0.99, p
CONCLUSIONS: Echocardiographic findings of post-arrest RV dysfunction were equally prevalent as LV dysfunction. RV dysfunction was significantly predictive of worse outcomes in post-arrest patients after accounting for LV dysfunction. Post-arrest RV dysfunction may be useful for risk stratification and management in this high-mortality population.
Recommended Citation
Ramjee, Vimal; Grossestreuer, Anne V.; Yao, Yuan; Perman, Sarah M.; Leary, Marion; Kirkpatrick, James N.; Forfia, Paul R.; Kolansky, Daniel M.; Abella, Benjamin S.; and Gaieski, David F., "Right ventricular dysfunction after resuscitation predicts poor outcomes in cardiac arrest patients independent of left ventricular function." (2015). Department of Emergency Medicine Faculty Papers. Paper 74.
https://jdc.jefferson.edu/emfp/74
PubMed ID
26318576
Language
English
Comments
This article has been peer reviewed. It is the authors' final version prior to publication in Resuscitation, Volume 96, November 2015, Pages 186-191.
The published version is available at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2015.08.008 Copyright © Elsevier