Alvimopan for the management of postoperative ileus after bowel resection: characterization of clinical benefit by pooled responder analysis.
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
9-1-2010
Abstract
BACKGROUND: A pooled post hoc responder analysis was performed to assess the clinical benefit of alvimopan, a peripherally acting mu-opioid receptor (PAM-OR) antagonist, for the management of postoperative ileus after bowel resection.
METHODS: Adult patients who underwent laparotomy for bowel resection scheduled for opioid-based intravenous patient-controlled analgesia received oral alvimopan or placebo preoperatively and twice daily postoperatively until hospital discharge or for 7 postoperative days. The proportion of responders and numbers needed to treat (NNT) were examined on postoperative days (POD) 3-8 for GI-2 recovery (first bowel movement, toleration of solid food) and hospital discharge order (DCO) written.
RESULTS: Alvimopan significantly increased the proportion of patients with GI-2 recovery and DCO written by each POD (P < 0.001 for all). More patients who received alvimopan achieved GI-2 recovery on or before POD 5 (alvimopan, 80%; placebo, 66%) and DCO written before POD 7 (alvimopan, 87%; placebo, 72%), with corresponding NNTs equal to 7.
CONCLUSIONS: On each POD analyzed, alvimopan significantly increased the proportion of patients who achieved GI-2 recovery and DCO written versus placebo and was associated with relatively low NNTs. The results of these analyses provide additional characterization and support for the overall clinical benefit of alvimopan in patients undergoing bowel resection.
Recommended Citation
Ludwig, Kirk; Viscusi, Eugene R; Wolff, Bruce G; Delaney, Conor P; Senagore, Anthony; and Techner, Lee, "Alvimopan for the management of postoperative ileus after bowel resection: characterization of clinical benefit by pooled responder analysis." (2010). Department of Anesthesiology Faculty Papers. Paper 22.
https://jdc.jefferson.edu/anfp/22
PubMed ID
20526599
Comments
This article has been peer reviewed. It was published in: World journal of surgery.
Volume 34, Issue 9, September 2010, Pages 2185-90.
The published version is available at . DOI: 10.1007/s00268-010-0635-9. Copyright © Springer