Document Type
Article
Publication Date
5-1-2010
Abstract
PURPOSE: To validate a third-generation performance-based measure of visual function titled "Assessment of Disability Related to Vision" (ADREV) in a study population of patients with diabetic retinopathy.
DESIGN: Prospective, cross-sectional study.
METHODS: Patients with nonproliferative or proliferative diabetic retinopathy, free from ocular comorbidity, were recruited from a single institute and completed the ADREV, the 25-Item National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire (VFQ-25), and a clinical ophthalmic examination. Correlation, regression, and bootstrap analysis were conducted to determine the relationship between ADREV scoring and each of the study's clinical and self-report measures of visual ability, while controlling for potential confounders.
RESULTS: Ninety-one patients with diabetic retinopathy completed the study and analysis showed that the ADREV total and subscale scores shared a stronger relationship with the clinical measures of visual function than did the VFQ total and subscale scores. Regression analysis revealed that binocular visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, and better eye visual field were the best predictors of ADREV performance.
CONCLUSIONS: The ADREV performance measure is a valid instrument for the assessment of disability related to vision in patients with diabetic retinopathy. Furthermore, the assessments provided by ADREV were more related to traditional clinical indicators of visual impairment than were the results of the self-report measure, specifically the VFQ-25.
Recommended Citation
Warrian, Kevin J.; Lorenzana, Luciano L.; Lankaranian, Dara; Dugar, Jyoti; Wizov, Sheryl S.; and Spaeth, George L., "The assessment of disability related to vision performance-based measure in diabetic retinopathy." (2010). Wills Eye Hospital Papers. Paper 4.
https://jdc.jefferson.edu/willsfp/4
PubMed ID
20399929
Comments
This article has been peer reviewed. It is the authors' final version prior to publication in American journal of ophthalmology Volume 149, Issue 5, May 2010, Pages 852-860.e1. The published version is available at DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2009.12.028. Copyright © Elsevier Inc.