Document Type
Article
Publication Date
8-21-2019
Abstract
Some controversy surrounds the postoperative feeding regimen utilized in patients who undergo esophagectomy. Variation in practices during the perioperative period exists including the type of nutrition started, the delivery route, and its timing. Adequate nutrition is essential for this patient population as these patients often present with weight loss and have altered eating patterns after surgery, which can affect their ability to regain or maintain weight. Methods of feeding after an esophagectomy include total parenteral nutrition, nasoduodenal/nasojejunal tube feeding, jejunostomy tube feeding, and oral feeding. Recent evidence suggests that early oral feeding is associated with shorter LOS, faster return of bowel function, and improved quality of life. Enhanced recovery pathways after surgery pathways after esophagectomy with a component of early oral feeding also seem to be safe, feasible, and cost-effective, albeit with limited data. However, data on anastomotic leaks is mixed, and some studies suggest that the incidence of leaks may be higher with early oral feeding. This risk of anastomotic leak with early feeding may be heavily modulated by surgical approach. No definitive data is currently available to definitively answer this question, and further studies should look at how these early feeding regimens vary by surgical technique. This review aims to discuss the existing literature on the optimal route and timing of feeding after esophagectomy.
Recommended Citation
Zheng, Richard; Devin, Courtney L.; Pucci, Michael J.; Berger, Adam C.; Rosato, Ernest L.; and Palazzo, Francesco, "Optimal timing and route of nutritional support after esophagectomy: A review of the literature." (2019). Department of Surgery Faculty Papers. Paper 173.
https://jdc.jefferson.edu/surgeryfp/173
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 License
PubMed ID
31496622
Language
English
Comments
This article has been peer reviewed. It is the author’s final published version in World Journal of Gastroenterology, Volume 25, Issue 31, August 2019, Pages 4427-4436.
The published version is available at https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v25.i31.4427. Copyright © Zheng et al.