Variability of patient spine education by Internet search engine.

Authors

George M. Ghobrial, MD, Thomas Jefferson UniversityFollow
Angud Mehdi, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital
Mitchell Maltenfort, PhD, Thomas Jefferson University HospitalFollow
Ashwini D Sharan, MD, Departments of Neurological Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University HospitalsFollow
James Harrop, MD, Rothman Institute, Thomas Jefferson UniversityFollow

Document Type

Article

Publication Date

3-1-2014

Comments

This article has been peer reviewed. It is the authors' final version prior to publication in Clinical neurology and neurosurgery.

Volume 118, March 2014, Pages 59-64.

The published version is available at DOI: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2013.12.013.. Copyright © Elsevier Inc.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients are increasingly reliant upon the Internet as a primary source of medical information. The educational experience varies by search engine, search term, and changes daily. There are no tools for critical evaluation of spinal surgery websites.

PURPOSE: To highlight the variability between common search engines for the same search terms. To detect bias, by prevalence of specific kinds of websites for certain spinal disorders. Demonstrate a simple scoring system of spinal disorder website for patient use, to maximize the quality of information exposed to the patient.

STUDY DESIGN: Ten common search terms were used to query three of the most common search engines. The top fifty results of each query were tabulated. A negative binomial regression was performed to highlight the variation across each search engine.

RESULTS: Google was more likely than Bing and Yahoo search engines to return hospital ads (P=0.002) and more likely to return scholarly sites of peer-reviewed lite (P=0.003). Educational web sites, surgical group sites, and online web communities had a significantly higher likelihood of returning on any search, regardless of search engine, or search string (P=0.007). Likewise, professional websites, including hospital run, industry sponsored, legal, and peer-reviewed web pages were less likely to be found on a search overall, regardless of engine and search string (P=0.078).

CONCLUSION: The Internet is a rapidly growing body of medical information which can serve as a useful tool for patient education. High quality information is readily available, provided that the patient uses a consistent, focused metric for evaluating online spine surgery information, as there is a clear variability in the way search engines present information to the patient.

Recommended Citation

Ghobrial, MD, George M.; Mehdi, Angud; Maltenfort, PhD, Mitchell; Sharan, MD, Ashwini D; and Harrop, MD, James, "Variability of patient spine education by Internet search engine." (2014). Department of Neurosurgery Faculty Papers. Paper 48.
https://jdc.jefferson.edu/neurosurgeryfp/48

PubMed ID

24529231