From Interior Supergraphics to Participation in the Public Sphere

Document Type

Book Chapter or Section

Publication Date

9-29-2024

Comments

This article is the author's final published version in Public Interiority, chapter 3, September 2024.

The published version is available at https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003493501-4.

Copyright © 2025 selection and editorial matter, Liz Teston; individual chapters, the contributors

Abstract

Fragmenting and juxtaposing large-scale urban billboards and signage into interior spaces were specific tactics of the late 1960s and early 1970s Supergraphics moment. Chronicled by critic C. Ray Smith, as what he called “experiments in spontaneous and transitory environments, in witty and flamboyant optical tricks,” the designs aimed to empower inhabitants to act on urgent societal issues. In doing so, Supergraphics challenged Modernism’s rigid ethos of universal truths, instead seeking immersive and emotional experiences that engaged urban life which I suggest is a state of public interiority. In this essay, I discuss and compare the Supergraphics experiments with public murals created at the same historic moment. My discussion is expanded by the theories of philosophers Michel Foucault and Jürgen Habermas, and architect, Charles Moore. I connect the late 1960s to our current milieu with reflections on recent urban graphics, including the street murals of the Black Lives Matter movement. By theorizing public interiority through the flat media of graphics, I offer a unique study of image, communication, and theories of modernity and Postmodernism as well as suggest the transformative potential of human participation in urban space.

Creative Commons License

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License.

Language

English

This document is currently not available here.

Share

COinS