Document Type
Article
Publication Date
3-3-2005
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Though studies suggest that computer-tailored health communications can help patients improve health behaviors, their effect on patient satisfaction, when used in health care settings, has yet to be examined. METHODS: A computer application was developed to provide tailored, printed feedback for patients and physicians about two of the most common adverse health behaviors seen in primary care, smoking and physical inactivity. Ten primary care providers and 150 of their patients were recruited to use the program in the office before their visit. After the visit, patients completed a self-report survey that addressed demographics, computer use history, satisfaction with the visit and the extent to which the physician addressed the reports during the visit. RESULTS: Most patients were female (67.6%), approximately half (46.0%) were seen for a routine exam, most (63.3%) had at least one chronic illness and fewer than a third (31.3%) had ever used the Internet or email. Most (81.1%) patients reported that the program was easy to use, but fewer than half of the doctors looked at the report in front of the patient (49.2%) or discussed the report with the patient (44.3%). Multivariate modeling showed that visit satisfaction was significantly greater among those whose doctor examined the report. This effect of the doctor examining the report on satisfaction was even greater for those who reported a chronic illness. CONCLUSIONS: Physicians who incorporate computer tailored messaging programs into the primary care setting, but who do not address the feedback reports that they create may contribute to patients being less satisfied with their care.
Recommended Citation
Sciamanna, Chris N.; Novak, Scott P.; Houston, Thomas K.; Gramling, Robert; and Marcus, Bess H., "Visit satisfaction and the use of tailored health behavior communications in primary care" (2005). College of Population Health Faculty Papers. Paper 1.
https://jdc.jefferson.edu/healthpolicyfaculty/1
Comments
This is the final, refereed version of the article, as prepared for publication in the American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 2004 June, vol.26, issue 5, pages 426-30. View the publisher's formatted version at http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/07493797