Annual Report Fall 2014-Summer 2015: The Design, Implementation, & Assessment of Nexus Learning Hubs
Document Type
Report
Publication Date
Summer 2015
Abstract
Executive Summary
Literature suggests that active and collaborative pedagogies, as compared to traditional lecturing, may enhance student engagement, motivation, retention, learning, and achievement. While Philadelphia University’s faculty members have embraced these Nexus Learning pedagogies that facilitate active and collaborative learning, the built environment of our traditional classrooms, and their associated technologies, have often limited the effectiveness. Philadelphia University began an initiative aiming to radically transform existing traditional learning spaces into intentionally designed learning environments that aim to minimize the physical and technological limitations of some of our traditional classrooms and maximize the beneficial evidence-based approaches of active, collaborative, real world pedagogies.
This annual report summarizes the processes of design/implementation, assessment results, and lessons learned from this first year of the Active Learning Space Initiative. The planning process included key campus stake-holders under consultation with external experts in learning space design. The fall 2014 semester saw the unveiling of two Nexus Learning Hubs intentionally designed to offer more seamless transitions from different modes of active learning, enhance versatility in furniture configurations to optimize active and collaborative interactions, and couple appropriate technologies with vibrant and modern spaces to allow students to co-create and critique information in an aesthetically motivating space. The Nexus Learning Hubs have provided an experimental space offering a no-risk, highly versatile environment in which faculty members can amass evidence-based approaches to optimizing the interconnectedness of the built learning space, pedagogies, and technology. To assess the effectiveness of these spaces, and identify weaknesses or oversights (lessons learned), we used direct and indirect methods such as the Active Learning Post-Occupancy Evaluation, ethnographic data garnered from classroom observations, periodic faculty and student surveys, and summaries from two faculty feedback sessions.
Recommended Citation
Ashley, Jeffrey; Frosten, Susan; Roydhouse, Marion; Dankner, Sally; and Gahagan, Shannon, "Annual Report Fall 2014-Summer 2015: The Design, Implementation, & Assessment of Nexus Learning Hubs" (2015). Annual Reports & Administrative Documents. Paper 2.
https://jdc.jefferson.edu/ctinlreports/2
Language
English
Comments
Table of Contents
2 - Executive Summary
3 - Nexus Learning: Philadelphia University’s Unique Approach to Teaching and Learning
3 - The Evolution of Active Learning Spaces at Philadelphia University
8 - Nexus Learning Hubs: Optimizing Nexus Learning Through Innovative Space and Technology
10 - The Design Process of the Nexus Learning Hubs
18 - Implementation and Assessment of the Nexus Learning Hubs
26 - Compiling Faculty Vignettes of Best Practices in Nexus Learning Hubs
31 - Getting the Word Out: Disseminating the First Year Successes of the Nexus Learning Hubs
34 - Lessons Learned: Garnering Information for the Next Iterations of Nexus Learning Hubs
Appendix I: Summary of Faculty’s Thoughts on Nexus Learning Hub (Hay111) and the Science & Health Nexus Classroom (Hay211)
Appendix II: Survey Results from the Mid-semester User Survey (created by Jeff Ashley and Sally Dankner)
Appendix III: Summaries of Class Observations
Appendix IV: Analysis of Steelcase Survey Provided by Steelcase
Appendix V: Raw Comment Data from Steelcase Survey Provided by Steelcase