Document Type
Article
Publication Date
1-2-2018
Abstract
The tumor suppressor protein retinoblastoma (RB) is mechanistically linked to suppression of transcription factor E2F1-mediated cell cycle regulation. For multiple tumor types, loss of RB function is associated with poor clinical outcome. RB action is abrogated either by direct depletion or through inactivation of RB function; however, the basis for this selectivity is unknown. Here, analysis of tumor samples and cell-free DNA from patients with advanced prostate cancer showed that direct RB loss was the preferred pathway of disruption in human disease. While RB loss was associated with lethal disease, RB-deficient tumors had no proliferative advantage and exhibited downstream effects distinct from cell cycle control. Mechanistically, RB loss led to E2F1 cistrome expansion and different binding specificity, alterations distinct from those observed after functional RB inactivation. Additionally, identification of protumorigenic transcriptional networks specific to RB loss that were validated in clinical samples demonstrated the ability of RB loss to differentially reprogram E2F1 in human cancers. Together, these findings not only identify tumor-suppressive functions of RB that are distinct from cell cycle control, but also demonstrate that the molecular consequence of RB loss is distinct from RB inactivation. Thus, these studies provide insight into how RB loss promotes disease progression, and identify new nodes for therapeutic intervention.
Recommended Citation
McNair, Christopher; Xu, Kexin; Mandigo, Amy C.; Benelli, Matteo; Leiby, Benjamin E.; Rodrigues, Daniel; Lindberg, Johan; Gronberg, Henrik; Crespo, Mateus; De Laere, Bram; Dirix, Luc; Visakorpi, Tapio; Li, Fugen; Feng, Felix Y.; de Bono, Johann; Demichelis, Francesca; Rubin, Mark A.; Brown, Myles; and Knudsen, Karen E., "Differential impact of RB status on E2F1 reprogramming in human cancer." (2018). Department of Cancer Biology Faculty Papers. Paper 124.
https://jdc.jefferson.edu/cbfp/124
PubMed ID
29202480
Comments
This article has been peer reviewed. It is the author’s final published version in Journal of Clinical Investigation
Volume 128, Issue 1, January 2018, Pages 341-358.
The published version is available at DOI: 10.1172/JCI93566. Copyright © American Society for Clinical Investigation