Document Type
Article
Publication Date
2-1-2019
Abstract
Background: A major innovation in atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation has been the introduction of contact force (CF) sensing catheters.
Objective: To evaluate procedural and clinical effects of transitioning to CF-guided AF ablation.
Methods: Consecutive AF ablation patients were studiedduring the period of time of transitioning from a non-CF to CF sensing catheter. Procedural data recorded was total radiofrequency time, time to isolate the left pulmonary veins (LPVs), and time to isolate the right pulmonary veins (RPVs). Clinically, the 3 and 12-month maintenance of sinus rhythm was noted and compared by: paroxysmal vs. persistent AF; CT scan LA volume more or less than 150 cc; CHA2DS2VASC more or less than 2; and LVEF more or less than 55%. Safety data was recorded as well.
Results: Total ablation times were shorter (113 vs.146 min, p=0.011)when using the CF catheters compared to non-CF ablations. This was driven by a decrease in both LPV (46 vs.72 min, p<0.001) and RPV time (54 vs. 75 min, p=0.002).The use of CF catheter did not change the overall percentage of patients in sinus rhythm at 3 and 12-months of follow up. However, sinus rhythm was more frequent at 12 months with CF ablation inpatients with an LA volume of more than 150 cc when compared to non-CF ablation (84.6% and 52.4%, p=0.03). There was no difference in outcomes with stratification by CHA2DS2VASC score or LVEF. No significant difference in complications was noted.
Conclusions: For AF ablation, the initial use of CF-sensing technology reduced procedure times with similar overall sinus rhythm maintenance at 3 and 12 months. CF improved 12-month outcomes in patients with an enlarged LA.
Recommended Citation
Frisch, Daniel R. and Dikdan, Sean J., "Clinical and Procedural Effects of Transitioning to Contact Force Guided Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation." (2019). Division of Cardiology Faculty Papers. Paper 67.
https://jdc.jefferson.edu/cardiologyfp/67
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Language
English
PubMed ID
31139294
Comments
This article has been peer reviewed. It is the author’s final published version in Journal of Atrial Fibrillation, Volume 11, Issue 5, February-March 2019.
The published version is available at here. Copyright © Frisch & Dikdan