Document Type
Article
Publication Date
10-3-2025
Abstract
This study investigates whether publicly listed cannabis shares provide enough risk-adjusted returns to warrant their incorporation into diversified portfolios. An equally weighted portfolio of cannabis companies is constructed using monthly data from January 2015 to December 2024. Risk-adjusted performance is assessed using the Sharpe, Sortino, and Omega ratios and compared to the Russell 3000 Index and the FTSE All-World ex-US Index. In addition, we estimate both unconditional and conditional Fama–French five-factor model enhanced by momentum. The findings indicate that cannabis stocks persistently underperform U.S. and global benchmarks in both absolute and risk-adjusted metrics. Downside risk is elevated because cannabis portfolios exhibit much higher value at risk (VaR) and conditional value at risk (CVaR) than broad indices, especially after COVID-19. The findings show that cannabis stocks are quite volatile and fail to generate significant returns on a risk-adjusted basis. The study highlights the sector’s structural vulnerabilities and cautions investors, portfolio managers, and regulators against treating cannabis shares as dependable long-term investments.
Recommended Citation
Malhotra, Davinder K. and Gupta, Sheetal, "The Cannabis Conundrum: Persistent Negative Alphas and Portfolio Risks" (2025). School of Business Faculty Papers. Paper 18.
https://jdc.jefferson.edu/sbfp/18
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Language
English


Comments
This article is the author’s final published version in Risks, Volume 13, Issue 10, 2025, Article number 193.
The published version is available at https://doi.org/10.3390/risks13100193. Copyright © 2025 by the authors.