Clinical application of ceramics in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: A review and update

Authors

Shayan A. Zadegan, Tehran University of Medical SciencesFollow
Aidin Abedi, Tehran University of Medical Sciences
Seyed B. Jazayeri, Tehran University of Medical SciencesFollow
Hirbod Bonaki, Tehran University of Medical Sciences
Alex R. Vaccaro, Thomas Jefferson UniversityFollow
Vafa Rahimi-Movaghar, Tehran University of Medical SciencesFollow

Document Type

Article

Publication Date

6-1-2017

Comments

This article has been peer reviewed. It is the author’s final published version in Global Spine Journal

Volume 7, Issue 4, June 2017, Pages 343-349.

The published version is available at DOI: 10.1177/2192568217699201. Copyright © Zadegan et al.

Abstract

Study Design: Narrative review. Objectives: Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is a reliable procedure, commonly used for cervical degenerative disc disease. For interbody fusions, autograft was the gold standard for decades; however, limited availability and donor site morbidities have led to a constant search for new materials. Clinically, it has been shown that calcium phosphate ceramics, including hydroxyapatite (HA) and tricalcium phosphate (TCP), are effective as osteoconductive materials and bone grafts. In this review, we present the current findings regarding the use of ceramics in ACDF. Methods: A review of the relevant literature examining the clinical use of ceramics in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion procedures was conducted using PubMed, OVID and Cochrane. Result: HA, coralline HA, sandwiched HA, TCP, and biphasic calcium phosphate ceramics were used in combination with osteoinductive materials such as bone marrow aspirate and various cages composed of poly-ether-ether-ketone (PEEK), fiber carbon, and titanium. Stand-alone ceramic spacers have been associated with fracture and cracks. Metallic cages such as titanium endure the risk of subsidence and migration. PEEK cages in combination with ceramics were shown to be a suitable substitute for autograft. Conclusion: None of the discussed options has demonstrated clear superiority over others, although direct comparisons are often difficult due to discrepancies in data collection and study methodologies. Future randomized clinical trials are warranted before definitive conclusions can be drawn. © The Author(s) 2017.

Recommended Citation

Zadegan, Shayan A.; Abedi, Aidin; Jazayeri, Seyed B.; Bonaki, Hirbod; Vaccaro, Alex R.; and Rahimi-Movaghar, Vafa, "Clinical application of ceramics in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: A review and update" (2017). Rothman Institute Faculty Papers. Paper 93.
https://jdc.jefferson.edu/rothman_institute/93

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License.