Document Type
Article
Publication Date
3-5-2013
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN: Literature review.
OBJECTIVE: To critically review all publications/internet sites that have described/used the Walking Index for Spinal Cord Injury (WISCI II), as a measure of impairment of walking function after spinal cord injury (SCI), in order to identify its psychometric properties, clarify its nature, specify misuse and incorporate the findings in an updated guide.
METHOD: A systematic literature search was done of Ovid MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsychINFO, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Scopus and electronic sites using key words: WISCI or WISCI II, SCI, paraplegia/ tetraplegia/ quadriplegia and ambulation/gait/walking. Among 1235 citations retrieved, 154 relevant articles/sites were identified, classified and examined by the authors; recommendations were made based on findings.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: The validity (face/concurrent/content/construct/convergent/criterion) and reliability of the WISCI II has been documented in clinical trials and clinical series, and considered adequate by systematic reviewers. In chronic SCI subjects, reliable determination of the maximum (as opposed to self-selected) WISCI II level requires more time and experience by the assessor. The correct use of WISCI II is clarified for testing acute/chronic phases of recovery after SCI, age of subjects, devices and settings. The WISCI II and walking speed measures may be performed simultaneously.
CONCLUSION: The increased use of the WISCI II is attributed to its unique characteristics as a capacity measure of walking function and its strong metric properties. Appropriate use of the WISCI II was clarified and incorporated into a new guide for its use. Combining it with a walking speed measure needs further study.
Recommended Citation
Ditunno, Jr, J. F.; Ditunno, P. L.; Scivoletto, G.; Patrick, M.; Dijkers, M.; Barbeau, H.; Burns, A. S.; Marino, R. J.; and Schmidt-Read, M., "The Walking Index for Spinal Cord Injury (WISCI/WISCI II): nature, metric properties, use and misuse." (2013). Department of Rehabilitation Medicine Faculty Papers. Paper 48.
https://jdc.jefferson.edu/rmfp/48
PubMed ID
23459122
Language
English
Comments
This article is the authors' final version prior to publication in Spinal Cord, Volume 51, Issue 5, May 2013, Pages 346-55.
The published version is available at https://doi.org/10.1038/sc.2013.9. Copyright © Ditunno et al.