Document Type
Article
Publication Date
6-2012
Abstract
The dual enrolling of phase I volunteers is a potential risk to subjects. It can also distort study results, threaten study validity, and possibly cause harm to future patients. Existing subject registries differ in structure, funding, and governance. Although the choice of the ideal system is driven by the scope of the risk and the funding mechanism, and is ultimately a value judgment of freedom versus paternalism, none of the registries significantly impinges on the tenets of ethically based research.
Recommended Citation
Kupetsky-Rincon, Erine A. and Kraft, Walter K., "Healthy Volunteer Registries and Ethical Research Principles" (2012). Department of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics Faculty Papers. Paper 36.
https://jdc.jefferson.edu/petfp/36
Comments
This article is peer reviewed. It is the author's final version prior to publication in Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics; 2012 Jun;91(6):965-8. ©Nature Publishing Group.