Document Type
Article
Publication Date
2-23-2024
Abstract
A hearing aid or a contralateral routing of signal device are options for unilateral cochlear implant listeners with limited hearing in the unimplanted ear; however, it is uncertain which device provides greater benefit beyond unilateral listening alone. Eighteen unilateral cochlear implant listeners participated in this prospective, within-participants, repeated measures study. Participants were tested with the cochlear implant alone, cochlear implant + hearing aid, and cochlear implant + contralateral routing of signal device configurations with a one-month take-home period between each in-person visit. Audiograms, speech perception in noise, and lateralization were evaluated. Subjective feedback was obtained via questionnaires. Marked improvement in speech in noise and non-implanted ear lateralization accuracy were observed with the addition of a contralateral hearing aid. There were no significant differences in speech recognition between listening configurations. However, the chronic device use questionnaires and the final device selection showed a clear preference for the hearing aid in spatial awareness and communication domains. Individuals with limited hearing in their unimplanted ears demonstrate significant improvement with the addition of a contralateral device. Subjective questionnaires somewhat contrast with clinic-based outcome measures, highlighting the delicate decision-making process involved in clinically advising one device or another to maximize communication benefits.
Recommended Citation
Lively, Sarah; Agrawal, Smita; Stewart, Matthew; Dwyer, Robert; Strobel, Laura; Marcinkevich, Paula; Hetlinger, Chris; and Croce, Julia, "CROS or Hearing Aid? Selecting the Ideal Solution for Unilateral CI Patients with Limited Aidable Hearing in the Contralateral Ear" (2024). Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery Faculty Papers. Paper 73.
https://jdc.jefferson.edu/otofp/73
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
S1 File.zip (566 kB)
PONE-D-23-13205 review.docx (14 kB)
Response to Reviewers.docx (96 kB)
PubMed ID
38394286
Language
English
Comments
This article is the author's final published version in PloS One, Volume 19, Issue 2, February 2024, Article number e0293811.
The published version is available at https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0293811.
Copyright © 2024 Lively et al