Document Type
Article
Publication Date
6-1-2019
Abstract
Purpose: Permanent seed implant cesium-131 (131Cs) brachytherapy provides highly localized radiation for patients with recurrent head and neck cancer (HNC), who may be ineligible for external beam radiation therapy due to a high-risk of toxicity. As carotid blowout is a concern in the setting of re-irradiation, a dose to the carotid artery was examined for 131Cs brachytherapy implants.
Material and methods: Eleven patients were implanted with131Cs adjacent to carotid at the time of resection for recurrent HNC. Vascularized tissue flaps were used in some patients. The carotid artery was contoured on the post-implant brachytherapy treatment plan, and the maximum carotid point dose and minimum carotid-seed distances are reported. The incidence of carotid blowout in the follow-up period was also measured.
Results: The maximum carotid dose was 77 ±52 Gy (range, 3-158 Gy). The closest seed to the carotid artery was 0.8 ±0.8 cm (range, 0.2-2.6 cm). One patient without a flap experienced carotid blowout, which was attributed to a non-healing wound rather than to high radiation doses.
Conclusions: Carotid artery doses from131Cs are reported. Vascularized tissue flaps should be considered when planning131Cs brachytherapy.
Recommended Citation
Walsh, Amanda; Hubley, Emily; Doyle, Laura M; Cognetti, David; Curry, Joseph; Bar-Ad, Voichita; and Luginbuhl, Adam, "Carotid dosimetry after re-irradiation with 131Cs permanent implant brachytherapy in recurrent, resected head and neck cancer" (2019). Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery Faculty Papers. Paper 44.
https://jdc.jefferson.edu/otofp/44
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 4.0 License.
PubMed ID
31447900
Language
English
Included in
Oncology Commons, Otolaryngology Commons, Radiation Medicine Commons
Comments
This article has been peer reviewed. It is the author’s final published version in Journal of Contemporary Brachytherapy, Volume 11, Issue 3, June 2019, Pages 221-226.
The published version is available at https://doi.org/10.5114/jcb.2019.86298. Copyright © Walsh et al.