Document Type
Article
Publication Date
2-1-2009
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Airway endoscopy is a difficult skill to master. A unique practicum was designed to help otolaryngology residents develop endoscopy skills. The learning modalities included lectures, an animal laboratory, high-fidelity manikins, virtual bronchoscopy simulation, and standardized patients. This study compares the relative subjective value of these learning modalities for skill development and realism. METHODS: Participants used a Likert scale (1=disagree to 5=agree) and open responses to anonymously rate the efficacy of 5 learning modalities for teaching airway management, endoscopy skills, and clinical leadership and for providing a realistic experience. RESULTS: The results in 2007 were uniformly positive, with mean scores for every category and modality greater than 4 for developing cognitive, psychomotor, and affective skills; managing normal and abnormal conditions; preventing and managing complications; improving endoscopy skills; understanding team process; and experiencing overall and manual "feel" realism. In 2008, the participants were encouraged to more critically evaluate the course. The ratings demonstrated statistically significant differences between the mean scores for 4 of the 9 evaluation categories in 2007 and all 9 categories in 2008. CONCLUSIONS: Specific learning modalities (e.g., lecture, animal laboratory, high-fidelity manikin, virtual bronchoscopy, standardized patient) were perceived to have different values for teaching airway management, developing endoscopy skills, teaching clinical leadership, and providing a realistic experience. We propose that these learning modalities can be used in a complementary manner.
Recommended Citation
Deutsch, Ellen S.; Christenson, Thomas; Curry, Joseph; Hossain, Jobayer; Zur, Karen; and Jacobs, Ian, "Multimodality education for airway endoscopy skill development." (2009). Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery Faculty Papers. Paper 4.
https://jdc.jefferson.edu/otofp/4
PubMed ID
19326756
Comments
This article has been peer reviewed and was published in Annals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology. Volume 118, Issue 2, February 2009, Pages 81-86. Copyright © Annals Publishing Company