Document Type
Article
Publication Date
8-5-2026
Abstract
Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for spontaneous supratentorial intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH) includes endoscopic evacuation and catheter-based evacuation (aspiration or drainage ± thrombolysis), but comparative performance remains uncertain. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing MIS approaches. PubMed, Embase, and CENTRAL were searched (December 2025) for studies in adults undergoing endoscopic or catheter-based MIS for supratentorial sICH. Random-effects meta-analysis was conducted. Prespecified subgroup analyses stratified catheter-based techniques by thrombolysis use. Risk of bias and certainty of evidence was assessed. Twenty-nine studies (8221 patients; 5041 endoscopic; 3180 catheter-based) were included. Endoscopic evacuation was associated with lower mortality (RR 0.64; 95% CI: 0.47–0.87; P < 0.01; I2 = 44.8%), rebleeding (RR 0.58; 95% CI: 0.39–0.87; P < 0.01; I2 = 22.2%), postoperative hematoma volume (MD -5.6 mL; 95% CI: -10.30–0.90; P < 0.05; I2 = 96.9%), and higher day-one evacuation rate (MD 24.5%; 95% CI: 14.60–34.40; P < 0.001; I2 = 99.7%). Overall complications (RR 0.98; 95% CI: 0.78–1.25; P = 0.90; I2 = 48.5%) and infection (RR 1.03; 95% CI: 0.64–1.66; P = 0.05; I2 = 43.6%) were similar. Catheter-based approaches had lower intraoperative blood loss (MD 69.0 mL; 95% CI: 27.7–110.4; P < 0.001; I2 = 96.9%). Subgroup analyses suggested that mortality and evacuation rate differences favored catheter-based cohorts receiving thrombolysis. Functional outcomes diverged: GCS/GOS favored endoscopy (SMD 0.27) while mRS marginally favored catheter-based approaches (MD 0.28), a between-group difference below the threshold generally considered clinically meaningful. Endoscopic evacuation was associated with lower mortality, rebleeding, and residual hematoma burden, while catheter-based approaches retained perioperative efficiency advantages. Functional findings were mixed and of uncertain clinical significance. Given predominantly non-randomized evidence and heterogeneity, these findings should be interpreted as strategy-specific associations.
Recommended Citation
Patel, Shaan; Nischal, Shiva A; Kale, Kush M; Mendonca, Angelette; Piper, Keenan; Patel, Pious D.; Gooch, Michael R.; Tjoumakaris, Stavropoula; and Jabbour, Pascal M., "Endoscopic Versus Catheter-Based Minimally Invasive Evacuation of Spontaneous Supratentorial Intracerebral Hemorrhage: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis" (2026). Department of Neurosurgery Faculty Papers. Paper 317.
https://jdc.jefferson.edu/neurosurgeryfp/317
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Supplementary_Figure_1.jpg (111 kB)
Supplementary_Figure_2.jpg (98 kB)
Supplementary_Figure_3.jpg (109 kB)
PubMed ID
42552275
Language
English

Comments
This article is the author's final published version in Neurosurgical Review, Volume 49, Issue 1, 2026, Article number 512.
The published version is available at https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-026-04426-3. Copyright © The Author(s) 2026.