Authors

Hamza Adel Salim
Vivek Yedavalli
Fathi Milhem
Nimer Adeeb
Basel Musmar, Thomas Jefferson UniversityFollow
Muhammed Amir Essibayi
Motaz Daraghma
Mahmoud Dibas
Nicole M. Cancelliere
Jose Danilo Bengzon Diestro
Oktay Algin
Sherief Ghozy
Sovann V. Lay
Adrien Guenego
Leonardo Renieri
Joseph Carnevale
Guillaume Saliou
Panagiotis Mastorakos, Thomas Jefferson University HospitalFollow
Kareem El Naamani, Thomas Jefferson UniversityFollow
Eimad Shotar
Markus Möhlenbruch
Michael Kral
Charlotte Chung
Mohamed M. Salem
Ivan Lylyk
Paul M. Foreman
Hamza Shaikh
Vedran Župančić
Muhammad U. Hafeez
Joshua Catapano
Muhammad Waqas
Muhammet Arslan
Onur Ergun
James D. Rabinov
Julian Maingard
Clemens M. Schirmer
Mariangela Piano
Anna L. Kühn
Caterina Michelozzi
Robert M. Starke
Ameer Hassan
Mark Ogilvie
Anh Nguyen
Jesse Jones
Waleed Brinjikji
Marie T. Nawka
Marios Psychogios
Christian Ulfert
Bryan Pukenas
Jan-Karl Burkhardt
Thien Huynh
Juan Carlos Martinez-Gutierrez
Sunil A. Sheth
Diana Slawski
Rabih Tawk
Benjamin Pulli
Boris Lubicz
Pietro Panni
Ajit S. Puri
Guglielmo Pero
Eytan Raz
Christoph J. Griessenauer
Hamed Asadi
Adnan Siddiqui
Elad I. Levy
Neil Haranhalli
David Altschul
Andrew F. Ducruet
Felipe C. Albuquerque
Robert W. Regenhardt
Christopher J. Stapleton
Peter Kan
Vladimir Kalousek
Pedro Lylyk
Srikanth Boddu
Jared Knopman
Stavropoula I. Tjoumakaris
Hugo H. Cuellar-Saenz
Pascal M. Jabbour
Frédéric Clarençon
Nicola Limbucci
Vitor Mendes Pereira
Aman B. Patel
Max Wintermark
Adam A. Dmytriw

Document Type

Article

Publication Date

3-3-2026

Comments

This article is the author's final published version in Neurosurgical Review, Volume 49, Issue 1, March 2026, Article Number 256.

The published version is available at https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-025-04077-w. Copyright © The Author(s) 2026.

Abstract

Data on the use of Woven EndoBridge (WEB) devices in the treatment of narrow-neck intracranial aneurysms (NNA) are limited. We compared the efficacy and safety of single-layer (SL) and single-layer spherical (SLS) WEB devices in treating NNA. We conducted a multicenter retrospective analysis of adult patients with NNA (neck ≤ 4 mm and width-to-neck ratio ≥ 2) treated with SL or SLS WEB devices between January 2011 and December 2022. Patients with fusiform or blister aneurysms, adjunctive treatments, or devices other than SL or SLS were excluded. Propensity score matching was used to adjust for confounding variables. Outcomes included procedural complications, angiographic occlusion rates using the Raymond Roy classification, major device compaction, need for retreatment, and functional outcomes assessed by the modified Rankin Scale (mRS). After matching, resulting in 101 patients in each group, baseline characteristics were well-balanced. Thromboembolic complications occurred in 2.0% of the SLS group and 5.9% of the SL group (P = 0.28). Hemorrhagic complications occurred in 1.0% of the SLS group and 6.4% of the SL group (P = 0.062). Adequate occlusion rates (Raymond Roy grades I and II) were similar between groups (96% in SLS vs. 91% in SL; P = 0.20). Major device compaction was significantly less frequent in the SLS group compared to the SL group (0% vs. 7.6%; P = 0.024). The need for retreatment trended to be lower in the SLS group (1.1% vs. 6.6% in SL; P = 0.12). Functional outcomes (mRS 0–1) at last follow-up were comparable (82% in SLS vs. 86% in SL; P = 0.41). In the treatment of narrow-neck intracranial aneurysms, the SLS WEB device was associated with significantly lower rates of major device compaction compared to the SL device. Reduced compaction may lead to a lower need for retreatment. Overall imaging outcomes and safety profiles were similar between the two devices.

Creative Commons License

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License.

PubMed ID

41772196

Language

English

Share

COinS