Start Date

10-29-2016 11:00 AM

End Date

10-29-2016 12:00 PM

Description

Purpose: To evaluate how community lay teachers, or Health Mentors (HMs), perceive student teams over time by using the Jefferson Teamwork Observation Guide (JTOG), a survey based upon interprofessional education (IPE) core competencies.

Background: Our academic health center offers a unique, two-year program emphasizing delivery of patient-centered care and IPE core competency skill development by pairing interprofessional student teams with a HM. The HM is an adult community volunteer with one or more chronic health condition(s). Student teams include representatives from couple and family therapy, medicine, nursing, occupational therapy, pharmacy, physical therapy, and physician assistant.

Description of Intervention or Program: HMs were invited to complete the JTOG survey in Spring 2015 and again in Fall 2015. This survey asked them to evaluate their student team members’ ability to work together based on IPE core competencies and solicited information from the HM about participating in the program. Student demonstration and attainment of IPE core competencies were evaluated using a Likert scale. Open-ended comment sections were included for the HM to describe specific observations or examples.

Results: A total of 50.4% of HMs completed the surveys for both semesters. There was a significant difference in knowledge gained by the HM pertaining to wellness from Spring 2015 to Fall 2015, t=-2.463 (df=54), p=0.017, d=0.27. There was also a significant negative correlation between worse health and neutral HM comments during the Spring of 2015, ρ=-0.410 (n=36), p=0.13.

Conclusion: Results were compiled and analyzed to evaluate HM perceptions of team functioning, including student engagement, friendly interaction, and respect for the HM. There were small changes between the Fall and Spring responses; most were not statistically significant. The HMs learned more about wellness and caring for themselves through this program.

Relevance to interprofessional education or practice: Results will be used as feedback to better educate students and identify areas for improvement in this interprofessional program.

Learning objectives:

1. Describe methods of evaluating teamwork among interprofessional students in the HM program.

2. Apply strategies to engage HMs as partners in developing and improving new models of interprofessional education and care.

Share

COinS
 
Oct 29th, 11:00 AM Oct 29th, 12:00 PM

Examining Health Mentor Perceptions of Student Teamwork

Purpose: To evaluate how community lay teachers, or Health Mentors (HMs), perceive student teams over time by using the Jefferson Teamwork Observation Guide (JTOG), a survey based upon interprofessional education (IPE) core competencies.

Background: Our academic health center offers a unique, two-year program emphasizing delivery of patient-centered care and IPE core competency skill development by pairing interprofessional student teams with a HM. The HM is an adult community volunteer with one or more chronic health condition(s). Student teams include representatives from couple and family therapy, medicine, nursing, occupational therapy, pharmacy, physical therapy, and physician assistant.

Description of Intervention or Program: HMs were invited to complete the JTOG survey in Spring 2015 and again in Fall 2015. This survey asked them to evaluate their student team members’ ability to work together based on IPE core competencies and solicited information from the HM about participating in the program. Student demonstration and attainment of IPE core competencies were evaluated using a Likert scale. Open-ended comment sections were included for the HM to describe specific observations or examples.

Results: A total of 50.4% of HMs completed the surveys for both semesters. There was a significant difference in knowledge gained by the HM pertaining to wellness from Spring 2015 to Fall 2015, t=-2.463 (df=54), p=0.017, d=0.27. There was also a significant negative correlation between worse health and neutral HM comments during the Spring of 2015, ρ=-0.410 (n=36), p=0.13.

Conclusion: Results were compiled and analyzed to evaluate HM perceptions of team functioning, including student engagement, friendly interaction, and respect for the HM. There were small changes between the Fall and Spring responses; most were not statistically significant. The HMs learned more about wellness and caring for themselves through this program.

Relevance to interprofessional education or practice: Results will be used as feedback to better educate students and identify areas for improvement in this interprofessional program.

Learning objectives:

1. Describe methods of evaluating teamwork among interprofessional students in the HM program.

2. Apply strategies to engage HMs as partners in developing and improving new models of interprofessional education and care.