Use or Consequences: Probing the Cognitive Difference Between Two Measures of Divergent Thinking
Recent studies have highlighted both similarities and differences between the cognitive processing that underpins memory retrieval and that which underpins creative thinking. To date, studies have focused more heavily on the Alternative Uses task, but fewer studies have investigated the processing underpinning other idea generation tasks. This study examines both Alternative Uses and Consequences idea generation with a methods pulled from cognitive psychology, and a novel method for evaluating the creativity of such responses. Participants were recruited from Amazon Mechanical Turk using a custom interface allowing for requisite experimental control. Results showed that both Alternative Uses and Consequences generation are well approximated by an exponential cumulative response time model, consistent with studies of memory retrieval. Participants were also slower to generate their first consequence compared with first responses to Alternative Uses, but inter-response time was negatively related to pairwise similarity on both tasks. Finally, the serial order effect is exhibited for both tasks, with Consequences earning more creative evaluations than Uses. The results have implications for burgeoning neuroscience research on creative thinking, and suggestions are made for future areas of inquiry. In addition, the experimental apparatus described provides an equitable way for researchers to obtain good quality cognitive data for divergent thinking tasks. © 2018 Hass and Beaty.
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Hass, Richard W. and Beaty, Roger E., "Use or Consequences: Probing the Cognitive Difference Between Two Measures of Divergent Thinking" (2018). College of Humanities and Sciences Faculty Papers. Paper 5.
This article has been peer reviewed. It is the author’s final published version in Frontiers in Psychology, Volume 9, Issue NOV, November 2018, Article number 2327 in Frontiers Media.
The published version is available at https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02327. Copyright © Hass & Beaty