Scholarship in rhetoric and composition has richly addressed the role of feminist mentoring and how a feminist perspective of mentoring might work across various mentoring configurations. However, there is little feminist rhetorical scholarship that discusses the transition from a graduate mentoring group to a faculty mentoring group. This case study examines how one group navigated the change from graduate mentors to faculty mentors, revealing how unarticulated conflict lead to the end of the relationships. In unpacking this narrative, this article argues that feminist mentoring scholarship has not done enough to openly discuss the role of conflict in mentoring. Lacking scholarship to guide the transition of the group, the members instead relied on assumptions about the role of feminist mentoring and what it means to be a feminist mentor. This piece offers ways of embracing conflict in feminist practices.
Gindlesparger, Kathryn and Ryan, Holly, "Feminist Fissures: Navigating Conflict in Mentoring Relationships" (2016). College of Humanities and Sciences Faculty Papers. Paper 14.
This is the final version of the article from the open access journal Peitho, Volume 19, Issue 1, Fall/Winter 2016.
The article can also be accessed on the journal's webiste: https://cfshrc.org/article/feminist-fissures-navigating-conflict-in-mentoring-relationships/