Document Type

Article

Publication Date

5-27-2026

Comments

This article is the author’s final published version in BMJ Open, Volume 16, Issue 5, 2026, Article number e119267.

The published version is available at https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-119267. Copyright © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2026.

 

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Accurate identification of acute stroke by the Emergency Medical Dispatch Centre (EMDC) is essential for timely treatment and efficient resource use. However, stroke mimics-conditions resembling stroke can often lead to overtriage, complicating emergency care. We aimed to quantify EMDC stroke overtriage and compare characteristics of stroke mimics with confirmed stroke cases.

DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING: Patients with suspected stroke identified by the EMDC in Western Norway between 1 January 2021 and 31 December 2022.

PARTICIPANTS: A total of 8,261 patients with EMDC suspected stroke were included. Stroke suspicion was determined using the Norwegian Medical Priority Dispatch System, which includes 11 stroke-related criteria. The study population was stratified into stroke mimics (non-stroke diagnosis) and confirmed strokes (transient ischaemic attack, acute ischaemic stroke or intracerebral haemorrhage discharge diagnosis) at hospital discharge. Data collected included dispatch codes, prehospital time metrics and hospital discharge diagnoses.

OUTCOME MEASURES: Outcomes of interest were the positive predictive value (PPV) of stroke identification based on EMDC dispatch criteria, the association between specific dispatch criteria and confirmed stroke and differences in prehospital time metrics.

RESULTS: Of 8,261 patients with an ambulance dispatch due to EMDC suspicion of stroke, only 1181 (14.3%) were confirmed strokes, resulting in a PPV of 14.3% (95% CI 13.6% to 15.1%). Five dispatch criteria-breathing problems, acute vertigo, hemianopsia, ataxia/confusion and headache-had stroke mimic rates exceeding 90%. The FAST (Face-Arm-Speech-Time) criteria were significantly associated with confirmed stroke after adjusting for age and sex (OR 3.55, 95% CI 1.55 to 8.07). EMS response times were similar between groups (median 10 min (IQR 7-14) vs 9 min (IQR 6-14); p=0.47), whereas stroke mimics had significantly longer on-scene times (median 16 min (IQR 9-24) vs 10 min (IQR 7-16); p< 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS: EMDC stroke dispatch criteria demonstrated low PPV, reflecting substantial overtriage due to stroke mimics at the earliest stage of emergency assessment. FAST-based criteria were associated with improved discrimination for confirmed stroke. Confirmed stroke cases had shorter EMS on-scene times, suggesting more streamlined prehospital management. These findings highlight the operational impact of stroke mimics on emergency services and the need to refine dispatch strategies. Because sensitivity could not be assessed, overall diagnostic performance remains uncertain, and future studies should include all stroke presentations to evaluate system-level accuracy.

Creative Commons License

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 License

Language

English

Included in

Public Health Commons

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.