Document Type

Article

Publication Date

5-8-2026

Comments

This article is the author’s final published version in Crohn's and Colitis 360, Volume 8, Issue 2, 2026, Article number otag028.

The published version is available at https://doi.org/10.1093/crocol/otag028. Copyright © The Author(s) 2026.

 

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is limited real-word data comparing efficacy of low dose upadacitinib (UPA) to high dose UPA as maintenance therapy for ulcerative colitis (UC).

METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study utilizing the U.S. Collaborative Network in adults ≥18 years old with UC who initiated UPA 15 mg compared to 30 mg for maintenance therapy between April 2022 and December 2023. The primary outcome was a composite of intravenous steroid use, oral steroid use, or colectomy from 12 to 60 weeks from the index UPA prescription. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed for demographics, co-morbid conditions, laboratory, and IBD medication history. Cox proportional hazard model was used to identify predictors of failure.

RESULTS:  Among 1110 patients on UPA maintenance therapy, 361 (32.5%) were on 15 mg and 749 (67.5%) were on 30 mg. After PSM, there was no difference in the composite outcome of steroid use or colectomy between the 15-mg UPA cohort versus 30 mg cohort (35.3% vs 35.6%; aHR 0.95, 0.71-1.24, P = .8). There was no difference in IV steroid use, oral steroid use or change in therapy between the two cohorts. There was no difference in the proportion of patients who achieved a fecal calprotectin of < 250 μg/g (55.8% vs 63.5%, P = .33). Recent oral or IV steroid use and rheumatoid arthritis were associated with failure of both 15 mg and 30 mg UPA.

CONCLUSION: Our study indicates that 15 mg UPA shows similar efficacy as 30 mg UPA for maintenance treatment in a subset of patients with UC.

Creative Commons License

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

PubMed ID

42137135

Language

English

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.