Document Type
Article
Publication Date
8-1-2024
Abstract
PURPOSE: Investigate patient preferences in embryo selection for transfer regarding quality versus sex in IVF/ICSI cycles with PGT-A and assess associated clinical implications.
METHODS: Retrospective cohort study at a university fertility practice from January 2012 to December 2021. Included were patients undergoing single frozen euploid transfers with at least one embryo of each sex available. Primary outcomes were preference for embryo selection (quality vs. sex) and sex preference (male vs. female). Trends over 10 years were evaluated and clinical outcomes, including clinical pregnancy rate (CPR), sustained implantation rate (SIR), and live birth rate (LBR), were compared.
RESULTS: A total of 5,145 embryo transfer cycles were included; 54.5% chose the best-quality embryo, while 45.5% selected based on sex. Among those choosing based on sex, 56.5% chose male embryos and 43.5% chose female. Preference for quality remained consistent over the decade (p = 0.30), while male embryos were consistently favored (p = 0.64). Best-quality embryos had higher grades (p < 0.001). Clinical outcomes were similar between groups (CPR: 74.4% vs. 71.9%, p = 0.05; SIR: 64.9% vs. 63.4%, p = 0.26; LBR: 58.8% vs. 56.7%, p = 0.13), and between male and female embryo selections.
CONCLUSIONS: Sex selection remains common, with 45.5% selecting embryos based on sex, predominantly favoring males. This trend persisted over 10 years, with comparable clinical outcomes regardless of selection criteria.
Recommended Citation
Gill, Pavan; Whitehead, Christine; Werner, Marie; and Seli, Emre, "Best Quality vs. Sex Selection - An Analysis of Embryo Selection Preferences for Patients Undergoing Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy Over a 10-Year Period" (2024). Jefferson Health - New Jersey Papers. Paper 3.
https://jdc.jefferson.edu/newjerseyfp/3
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Language
English
Comments
This article is the author’s final published version in Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, Volume 41, 2024, Pages 2211-2216.
The published version is available at https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-024-03162-1. Copyright © The Author(s) 2024.
Publication made possible in part by support through a transformative agreement between Thomas Jefferson University and the publisher.