Document Type
Article
Publication Date
3-27-2025
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The past decade has seen a paradigm shift in the evaluation and management of Parkinson's disease psychosis (PDP), with the first approval of an antipsychotic in the US in 2016. An evidence-based review by the Movement Disorder Society found pimavanserin and clozapine to be clinically useful, (low-dose) quetiapine to be possibly useful, and all other antipsychotics to be avoided due to motor worsening. Clozapine and quetiapine use can be limited by provoking Parkinson's disease (PD) nonmotor symptoms of somnolence and hypotension. Quetiapine may also be limited by its risk in cognitive impairment. Pimavanserin is not associated with these symptoms. Despite advances in the understanding of PDP and the approval of pimavanserin in the US, clinical questions concerning patient selection, treatment timing, switch strategies, and combination therapy remain.
AREAS COVERED: To develop a consensus on first-line and subsequent treatment strategies for PDP, a panel of experts reviewed the clinical presentation and course of PDP, then discussed clinical trial evidence and experience.
EXPERT OPINION: PDP is a common but still undertreated sequela of PD progression. Pimavanserin is recommended as a first-line antipsychotic therapy based on its established safety and efficacy. While switching strategies are suggested, further study is needed to assess combination antipsychotic therapy.
Recommended Citation
Isaacson, Stuart H.; Nasrallah, Henry; Pahwa, Rajesh; Alva, Gustavo; Kremens, Daniel; and Stahl, Stephen M., "Management of Parkinson's Disease Psychosis: First-Line Antipsychotic Selection and Rationale for Continuing, Combining, or Switching" (2025). Department of Neurology Faculty Papers. Paper 360.
https://jdc.jefferson.edu/neurologyfp/360
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License.
PubMed ID
40138188
Language
English
Comments
This article is the author’s final published version in Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy, Volume 26, Issue 6, 2025, Pages 707 - 717.
The published version is available at https://doi.org/10.1080/14656566.2025.2481205. Copyright © 2025 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.