<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Faculty Papers</title>
<copyright>Copyright (c) 2013 Thomas Jefferson University All rights reserved.</copyright>
<link>http://jdc.jefferson.edu/bmpfp</link>
<description>Recent documents in Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Faculty Papers</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2013 16:35:26 PST</lastBuildDate>
<ttl>3600</ttl>








<item>
<title>Structural insights into initial and intermediate steps of the ribosome-recycling process</title>
<link>http://jdc.jefferson.edu/bmpfp/44</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://jdc.jefferson.edu/bmpfp/44</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2013 08:46:05 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p><strong>The ribosome recycling factor (RRF) and elongation factor G (EF-G) disassemble the 70S post-termination complex (PoTC) into mRNA, tRNA, and two ribosomal subunits. We have determined cryo-EM structures of the PoTC•RRF complex, with and without EF-G. We find that domain II of RRF initially interacts with universally conserved residues of the 23S rRNA helices 43 and 95, and protein L11 within the 50S ribosomal subunit. Upon EF-G binding, both RRF and tRNA are driven toward the tRNA-exit (E) site, with a large rotational movement of domain II of RRF toward the 30S ribosomal subunit. During this intermediate step of the recycling process, domain II of RRF and domain IV of EF-G adapt unusual conformations. Furthermore, binding of EF-G to the PoTC•RRF complex reverts the ribosome from ratcheted to unratcheted state. These results suggest that (i) the ribosomal intersubunit reorganizations upon RRF binding and subsequent EF-G binding could be instrumental in destabilizing the PoTC, and (ii) the modes of action of EF-G during tRNA translocation and ribosome recycling steps are markedly different.</strong></p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Takeshi Yokoyama et al.</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>Possible steps of complete disassembly of post-termination complex by yeast eEF3 deduced from inhibition by translocation inhibitors.</title>
<link>http://jdc.jefferson.edu/bmpfp/43</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://jdc.jefferson.edu/bmpfp/43</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2013 07:19:10 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>Ribosomes, after one round of translation, must be recycled so that the next round of translation can occur. Complete disassembly of post-termination ribosomal complex (PoTC) in yeast for the recycling consists of three reactions: release of tRNA, release of mRNA and splitting of ribosomes, catalyzed by eukaryotic elongation factor 3 (eEF3) and ATP. Here, we show that translocation inhibitors cycloheximide and lactimidomycin inhibited all three reactions. Cycloheximide is a non-competitive inhibitor of both eEF3 and ATP. The inhibition was observed regardless of the way PoTC was prepared with either release factors or puromycin. Paromomycin not only inhibited all three reactions but also re-associated yeast ribosomal subunits. On the other hand, sordarin or fusidic acid, when applied together with eEF2/GTP, specifically inhibited ribosome splitting without blocking of tRNA/mRNA release. From these inhibitor studies, we propose that, in accordance with eEF3's known function in elongation, the release of tRNA via exit site occurs first, then mRNA is released, followed by the splitting of ribosomes during the disassembly of post-termination complexes catalyzed by eEF3 and ATP.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Shinya Kurata et al.</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>Possible steps of complete disassembly of post-termination complex by yeast eEF3 deduced from inhibition by translocation inhibitors.</title>
<link>http://jdc.jefferson.edu/bmpfp/42</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://jdc.jefferson.edu/bmpfp/42</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2012 08:22:48 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>Ribosomes, after one round of translation, must be recycled so that the next round of translation can occur. Complete disassembly of post-termination ribosomal complex (PoTC) in yeast for the recycling consists of three reactions: release of tRNA, release of mRNA and splitting of ribosomes, catalyzed by eukaryotic elongation factor 3 (eEF3) and ATP. Here, we show that translocation inhibitors cycloheximide and lactimidomycin inhibited all three reactions. Cycloheximide is a non-competitive inhibitor of both eEF3 and ATP. The inhibition was observed regardless of the way PoTC was prepared with either release factors or puromycin. Paromomycin not only inhibited all three reactions but also re-associated yeast ribosomal subunits. On the other hand, sordarin or fusidic acid, when applied together with eEF2/GTP, specifically inhibited ribosome splitting without blocking of tRNA/mRNA release. From these inhibitor studies, we propose that, in accordance with eEF3's known function in elongation, the release of tRNA via exit site occurs first, then mRNA is released, followed by the splitting of ribosomes during the disassembly of post-termination complexes catalyzed by eEF3 and ATP.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Shinya Kurata et al.</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>Global cellular regulation including cardiac function by post-translational protein arginylation.</title>
<link>http://jdc.jefferson.edu/bmpfp/41</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://jdc.jefferson.edu/bmpfp/41</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2012 13:55:54 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>In this issue a very significant contribution to cardiology describing critical roles of ATE1 appears by Kurosaka et al. <a href="http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022282812002210#bb0005" id="x-x-ancbbb0005">[1]</a>. In view of this paper, as the discoverers of ATE1, we have been asked to contribute an article (editorial) regarding ATE1 (enzyme which transfers arginine from arginyl tRNA to protein acceptors). This short article consists of three sections: 1) a historical anecdote describing how ATE1 was discovered; 2) its possible role in aging and cellular transformation, and most importantly; 3) its role in the development and maintenance of cardiac activity. The last section has direct bearing to the Kurosaka et al. paper.</p>
<p>© <a href="http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/homepage.cws_home">Elsevier B.V.</a></p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Hideko Kaji et al.</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>Mitochondrial lysyl-tRNA synthetase independent import of tRNA lysine into yeast mitochondria.</title>
<link>http://jdc.jefferson.edu/bmpfp/40</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://jdc.jefferson.edu/bmpfp/40</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2012 09:31:50 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>Aminoacyl tRNA synthetases play a central role in protein synthesis by charging tRNAs with amino acids. Yeast mitochondrial lysyl tRNA synthetase (Msk1), in addition to the aminoacylation of mitochondrial tRNA, also functions as a chaperone to facilitate the import of cytosolic lysyl tRNA. In this report, we show that human mitochondrial Kars (lysyl tRNA synthetase) can complement the growth defect associated with the loss of yeast Msk1 and can additionally facilitate the in vitro import of tRNA into mitochondria. Surprisingly, the import of lysyl tRNA can occur independent of Msk1 in vivo. This suggests that an alternative mechanism is present for the import of lysyl tRNA in yeast.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Naresh Babu V Sepuri et al.</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>Multiple domains in Siz SUMO ligases contribute to substrate selectivity.</title>
<link>http://jdc.jefferson.edu/bmpfp/39</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://jdc.jefferson.edu/bmpfp/39</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2012 12:29:44 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>Saccharomyces cerevisiae contains two Siz/PIAS SUMO E3 ligases, Siz1 and Siz2/Nfi1, and one other known ligase, Mms21. Although ubiquitin ligases are highly substrate-specific, the degree to which SUMO ligases target distinct sets of substrates is unknown. Here we show that although Siz1 and Siz2 each have unique substrates in vivo, sumoylation of many substrates can be stimulated by either protein. Furthermore, in the absence of both Siz proteins, many of the same substrates are still sumoylated at low levels. Some of this residual sumoylation depends on MMS21. Siz1 targets its unique substrates through at least two distinct domains. Sumoylation of PCNA (proliferating cell nuclear antigen) and the splicing factor Prp45 requires part of the N-terminal region of Siz1, the ;PINIT' domain, whereas sumoylation of the bud neck-associated septin proteins Cdc3, Cdc11 and Shs1/Sep7 requires the C-terminal domain of Siz1, which is also sufficient for cell cycle-dependent localization of Siz1 to the bud neck. Remarkably, the non-sumoylated septins Cdc10 and Cdc12 also undergo Siz1-dependent sumoylation if they are fused to the short PsiKXE SUMO attachment-site sequence. Collectively, these results suggest that local concentration of the E3, rather than a single direct interaction with the substrate polypeptide, is the major factor in substrate selectivity by Siz proteins.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Alison Reindle et al.</author>


<category>Cell Cycle Proteins</category>

<category>Consensus Sequence</category>

<category>Cytoskeletal Proteins</category>

<category>GTP Phosphohydrolases</category>

<category>Membrane Proteins</category>

<category>Mutation</category>

<category>Proliferating Cell Nuclear Antigen</category>

<category>Protein Structure, Tertiary</category>

<category>Recombinant Fusion Proteins</category>

<category>SUMO-1 Protein</category>

<category>Saccharomyces cerevisiae</category>

<category>Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins</category>

<category>Small Ubiquitin-Related Modifier Proteins</category>

<category>Substrate Specificity</category>

<category>Ubiquitin-Protein Ligases</category>

</item>






<item>
<title>Protein synthesis factors (RF1, RF2, RF3, RRF, and tmRNA) and peptidyl-tRNA hydrolase rescue stalled ribosomes at sense codons.</title>
<link>http://jdc.jefferson.edu/bmpfp/38</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://jdc.jefferson.edu/bmpfp/38</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2012 11:14:54 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>During translation, ribosomes stall on mRNA when the aminoacyl-tRNA to be read is not readily available. The stalled ribosomes are deleterious to the cell and should be rescued to maintain its viability. To investigate the contribution of some of the cellular translation factors on ribosome rescuing, we provoked stalling at AGA codons in mutants that affected the factors and then analyzed the accumulation of oligopeptidyl (peptides of up to 6 amino acid residues, oligopep-)-tRNA or polypeptidyl (peptides of more than 300 amino acids in length, polypep-)-tRNA associated with ribosomes. Stalling was achieved by starvation for aminoacyl-tRNA(Arg4) upon induced expression of engineered lacZ (β-galactosidase) reporter gene harboring contiguous AGA codons close to the initiation codon or at internal codon positions together with minigene ATGAGATAA accompanied by reduced peptidyl-tRNA hydrolase (Pth). Our results showed accumulations of peptidyl-tRNA associated with ribosomes in mutants for release factors (RF1, RF2, and RF3), ribosome recycling factor (RRF), Pth, and transfer-messenger RNA (tmRNA), implying that each of these factors cooperate in rescuing stalled ribosomes. The role of these factors in ribosome releasing from the stalled complex may vary depending on the length of the peptide in the peptidyl-tRNA. RF3 and RRF rescue stalled ribosomes by "drop-off" of peptidyl-tRNA, while RF1, RF2 (in the absence of termination codon), or Pth may rescue by hydrolyzing the associated peptidyl-tRNA. This is followed by the disassembly of the ribosomal complex of tRNA and mRNA by RRF and elongation factor G.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Serafín Vivanco-Domínguez et al.</author>


<category>Carboxylic Ester Hydrolases</category>

<category>Codon</category>

<category>Escherichia coli</category>

<category>Models, Biological</category>

<category>Peptide Termination Factors</category>

<category>Protein Biosynthesis</category>

<category>RNA, Bacterial</category>

<category>RNA, Messenger</category>

<category>Ribosomal Proteins</category>

<category>Ribosomes</category>

<category>beta-Galactosidase</category>

</item>






<item>
<title>Engrailed cooperates directly with Extradenticle and Homothorax on a distinct class of homeodomain binding sites to repress sloppy paired.</title>
<link>http://jdc.jefferson.edu/bmpfp/37</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://jdc.jefferson.edu/bmpfp/37</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2012 11:36:04 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>Even skipped (Eve) and Engrailed (En) are homeodomain-containing transcriptional repressors with similar DNA binding specificities that are sequentially expressed in Drosophila embryos. The sloppy-paired (slp) locus is a target of repression by both Eve and En. At blastoderm, Eve is expressed in 7 stripes that restrict the posterior border of slp stripes, allowing engrailed (en) gene expression to be initiated in odd-numbered parasegments. En, in turn, prevents expansion of slp stripes after Eve is turned off. Prior studies showed that the two tandem slp transcription units are regulated by cis-regulatory modules (CRMs) with activities that overlap in space and time. An array of CRMs that generate 7 stripes at blastoderm, and later 14 stripes, surround slp1 (Fujioka and Jaynes, 2012). Surprisingly given their similarity in DNA binding specificity and function, responsiveness to ectopic Eve and En indicates that most of their direct target sites are either in distinct CRMs, or in different parts of coregulated CRMs. We localized cooperative binding sites for En, with the homeodomain-containing Hox cofactors Extradenticle (Exd) and Homothorax (Hth), within two CRMs that drive similar expression patterns. Functional analysis revealed two distinct, redundant sites within one CRM. The other CRM contains a single cooperative site that is both necessary and sufficient for repression in the en domain. Correlating in vivo and in vitro analysis suggests that cooperativity with Exd and Hth is a key ingredient in the mechanism of En-dependent repression, and that apparent affinity in vitro is an unreliable predictor of in vivo function.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Miki Fujioka et al.</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>Synergetic effect of recoverin and calmodulin on regulation of rhodopsin kinase.</title>
<link>http://jdc.jefferson.edu/bmpfp/36</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://jdc.jefferson.edu/bmpfp/36</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2012 13:34:57 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>Phosphorylation of photoactivated rhodopsin by rhodopsin kinase (RK or GRK1), a first step of the phototransduction cascade turnoff, is under the control of Ca(2+)/recoverin. Here, we demonstrate that calmodulin, a ubiquitous Ca(2+)-sensor, can inhibit RK, though less effectively than recoverin does. We have utilized the surface plasmon resonance technology to map the calmodulin binding site in the RK molecule. Calmodulin does not interact with the recoverin-binding site within amino acid residues M1-S25 of the enzyme. Instead, the high affinity calmodulin binding site is localized within a stretch of amino acid residues V150-K175 in the N-terminal regulatory region of RK. Moreover, the inhibitory effect of calmodulin and recoverin on RK activity is synergetic, which is in agreement with the existence of separate binding sites for each Ca(2+)-sensing protein. The synergetic inhibition of RK by both Ca(2+)-sensors occurs over a broader range of Ca(2+)-concentration than by recoverin alone, indicating increased Ca(2+)-sensitivity of RK regulation in the presence of both Ca(2+)-sensors. Taken together, our data suggest that RK regulation by calmodulin in photoreceptor cells could complement the well-known inhibitory effect of recoverin on RK.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Ilya I Grigoriev et al.</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>Regulation of a duplicated locus: Drosophila sloppy paired is replete with functionally overlapping enhancers.</title>
<link>http://jdc.jefferson.edu/bmpfp/35</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://jdc.jefferson.edu/bmpfp/35</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2012 12:51:51 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>In order to investigate regulation and redundancy within the sloppy paired (slp) locus, we analyzed 30 kilobases of DNA encompassing the tandem, coordinately regulated slp1 and slp2 transcription units. We found a remarkable array of stripe enhancers with overlapping activities surrounding the slp1 transcription unit, and, unexpectedly, glial cell enhancers surrounding slp2. The slp stripe regulatory region generates 7 stripes at blastoderm, and later 14 stripes that persist throughout embryogenesis. Phylogenetic analysis among drosophilids suggests that the multiplicity of stripe enhancers did not evolve through recent duplication. Most of the direct integration among cis-regulatory modules appears to be simply additive, with one notable exception. Despite the apparent redundancy among stripe enhancers, transgenic rescue suggests that most are required for full function, to maintain wingless expression and parasegment boundaries throughout embryogenesis. Transgenic rescue also reveals indirect positive autoregulation by the 7 early stripes, without which alternate stripes within the 14-stripe pattern are lost, leading to embryos with a pair-rule phenotype.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Miki Fujioka et al.</author>


<category>Animals</category>

<category>Base Sequence</category>

<category>Computational Biology</category>

<category>Conserved Sequence</category>

<category>Drosophila Proteins</category>

<category>Drosophila melanogaster</category>

<category>Enhancer Elements, Genetic</category>

<category>Evolution, Molecular</category>

<category>Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental</category>

<category>Genes, Duplicate</category>

<category>In Situ Hybridization</category>

<category>Molecular Sequence Data</category>

<category>Neuroglia</category>

<category>Phylogeny</category>

<category>Sequence Analysis, DNA</category>

<category>Transcription Factors</category>

</item>






<item>
<title>Testosterone treatment fails to accelerate disease in a transgenic mouse model of spinal and bulbar muscular atrophy.</title>
<link>http://jdc.jefferson.edu/bmpfp/34</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://jdc.jefferson.edu/bmpfp/34</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2012 11:51:25 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>Evidence from multiple animal models demonstrates that testosterone plays a crucial role in the progression of symptoms in spinal and bulbar muscular atrophy (SBMA), a condition that results in neurodegeneration and muscle atrophy in affected men. Mice bearing a transgene encoding a human androgen receptor (AR) that contains a stretch of 112 glutamines (expanded polyglutamine tract; AR112Q mice) reproduce several aspects of the human disease. We treated transgenic male AR112Q mice with testosterone for 6 months. Surprisingly, testosterone treatment of AR112Q males did not exacerbate the disease. Although transgenic AR112Q males exhibited functional deficits when compared with non-transgenics, long-term testosterone treatment had no effect on motor function. Testosterone treatment also failed to affect cellular markers of disease, including inclusion formation (the accumulation of large nuclear aggregates of mutant AR protein) and levels of unphosphorylated neurofilament heavy chain. These data suggest that the mechanism of disease in SBMA saturates at close to endogenous hormone levels and that individuals with SBMA who take, or have taken, testosterone for its putative therapeutic properties are unlikely to suffer adverse effects.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Erica S Chevalier-Larsen et al.</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>Abeta42 mutants with different aggregation profiles induce distinct pathologies in Drosophila.</title>
<link>http://jdc.jefferson.edu/bmpfp/33</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://jdc.jefferson.edu/bmpfp/33</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 12:30:30 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>Aggregation of the amyloid-beta-42 (Abeta42) peptide in the brain parenchyma is a pathological hallmark of Alzheimer's disease (AD), and the prevention of Abeta aggregation has been proposed as a therapeutic intervention in AD. However, recent reports indicate that Abeta can form several different prefibrillar and fibrillar aggregates and that each aggregate may confer different pathogenic effects, suggesting that manipulation of Abeta42 aggregation may not only quantitatively but also qualitatively modify brain pathology. Here, we compare the pathogenicity of human Abeta42 mutants with differing tendencies to aggregate. We examined the aggregation-prone, EOFAD-related Arctic mutation (Abeta42Arc) and an artificial mutation (Abeta42art) that is known to suppress aggregation and toxicity of Abeta42 in vitro. In the Drosophila brain, Abeta42Arc formed more oligomers and deposits than did wild type Abeta42, while Abeta42art formed fewer oligomers and deposits. The severity of locomotor dysfunction and premature death positively correlated with the aggregation tendencies of Abeta peptides. Surprisingly, however, Abeta42art caused earlier onset of memory defects than Abeta42. More remarkably, each Abeta induced qualitatively different pathologies. Abeta42Arc caused greater neuron loss than did Abeta42, while Abeta42art flies showed the strongest neurite degeneration. This pattern of degeneration coincides with the distribution of Thioflavin S-stained Abeta aggregates: Abeta42Arc formed large deposits in the cell body, Abeta42art accumulated preferentially in the neurites, while Abeta42 accumulated in both locations. Our results demonstrate that manipulation of the aggregation propensity of Abeta42 does not simply change the level of toxicity, but can also result in qualitative shifts in the pathology induced in vivo.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Koichi Iijima et al.</author>


<category>Amyloid beta-Peptides</category>

<category>Animals</category>

<category>Brain</category>

<category>Dimerization</category>

<category>Drosophila</category>

<category>Humans</category>

<category>Memory</category>

<category>Motor Activity</category>

<category>Mutation</category>

<category>Nerve Degeneration</category>

<category>Neurites</category>

<category>Neurons</category>

</item>






<item>
<title>Neutralization of botulinum neurotoxin by a human monoclonal antibody specific for the catalytic light chain.</title>
<link>http://jdc.jefferson.edu/bmpfp/32</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://jdc.jefferson.edu/bmpfp/32</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 12:30:29 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>BACKGROUND: Botulinum neurotoxins (BoNT) are a family of category A select bioterror agents and the most potent biological toxins known. Cloned antibody therapeutics hold considerable promise as BoNT therapeutics, but the therapeutic utility of antibodies that bind the BoNT light chain domain (LC), a metalloprotease that functions in the cytosol of cholinergic neurons, has not been thoroughly explored.</p>
<p>METHODS AND FINDINGS: We used an optimized hybridoma method to clone a fully human antibody specific for the LC of serotype A BoNT (BoNT/A). The 4LCA antibody demonstrated potent in vivo neutralization when administered alone and collaborated with an antibody specific for the HC. In Neuro-2a neuroblastoma cells, the 4LCA antibody prevented the cleavage of the BoNT/A proteolytic target, SNAP-25. Unlike an antibody specific for the HC, the 4LCA antibody did not block entry of BoNT/A into cultured cells. Instead, it was taken up into synaptic vesicles along with BoNT/A. The 4LCA antibody also directly inhibited BoNT/A catalytic activity in vitro.</p>
<p>CONCLUSIONS: An antibody specific for the BoNT/A LC can potently inhibit BoNT/A in vivo and in vitro, using mechanisms not previously associated with BoNT-neutralizing antibodies. Antibodies specific for BoNT LC may be valuable components of an antibody antidote for BoNT exposure.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Sharad P Adekar et al.</author>


<category>Antibodies, Monoclonal</category>

<category>Antibody Specificity</category>

<category>Botulinum Antitoxin</category>

<category>Botulinum Toxins</category>

<category>Cell Line, Tumor</category>

<category>Cloning, Molecular</category>

<category>Humans</category>

<category>Immunoglobulin Light Chains</category>

<category>Kinetics</category>

<category>Neuroblastoma</category>

<category>Recombinant Proteins</category>

<category>Serotyping</category>

</item>






<item>
<title>Interaction with LC8 is required for Pak1 nuclear import and is indispensable for zebrafish development.</title>
<link>http://jdc.jefferson.edu/bmpfp/31</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://jdc.jefferson.edu/bmpfp/31</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 12:30:27 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>Pak1 (p21 activated kinase 1) is a serine/threonine kinase implicated in regulation of cell motility and survival and in malignant transformation of mammary epithelial cells. In addition, the dynein light chain, LC8, has been described to cooperate with Pak1 in malignant transformation of breast cancer cells. Pak1 itself may aid breast cancer development by phosphorylating nuclear proteins, including estrogen receptor alpha. Recently, we showed that the LC8 binding site on Pak1 is adjacent to the nuclear localization sequence (NLS) required for Pak1 nuclear import. Here, we demonstrate that the LC8-Pak1 interaction is necessary for epidermal growth factor (EGF)-induced nuclear import of Pak1 in MCF-7 cells, and that this event is contingent upon LC8-mediated Pak1 dimerization. In contrast, Pak2, which lacks an LC8 binding site but contains a nuclear localization sequence identical to that in Pak1, remains cytoplasmic upon EGF stimulation of MCF-7 cells. Furthermore, we show that severe developmental defects in zebrafish embryos caused by morpholino injections targeting Pak are partially rescued by co-injection of wild-type human Pak1, but not by co-injection of mutant Pak1 mRNA disrupting either the LC8 binding or the NLS site. Collectively, these results suggest that LC8 facilitates nuclear import of Pak1 and that this function is indispensable during vertebrate development.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Christine M Lightcap et al.</author>


<category>Active Transport, Cell Nucleus</category>

<category>Animals</category>

<category>Binding Sites</category>

<category>Cell Line, Tumor</category>

<category>Cell Movement</category>

<category>Cell Survival</category>

<category>Cytoplasmic Dyneins</category>

<category>Dimerization</category>

<category>Dyneins</category>

<category>Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental</category>

<category>Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic</category>

<category>Humans</category>

<category>Protein Binding</category>

<category>Zebrafish</category>

<category>p21-Activated Kinases</category>

</item>






<item>
<title>Phosphorylation meets nuclear import: a review.</title>
<link>http://jdc.jefferson.edu/bmpfp/30</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://jdc.jefferson.edu/bmpfp/30</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 12:30:25 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>Phosphorylation is the most common and pleiotropic modification in biology, which plays a vital role in regulating and finely tuning a multitude of biological pathways. Transport across the nuclear envelope is also an essential cellular function and is intimately linked to many degeneration processes that lead to disease. It is therefore not surprising that phosphorylation of cargos trafficking between the cytoplasm and nucleus is emerging as an important step to regulate nuclear availability, which directly affects gene expression, cell growth and proliferation. However, the literature on phosphorylation of nucleocytoplasmic trafficking cargos is often confusing. Phosphorylation, and its mirror process dephosphorylation, has been shown to have opposite and often contradictory effects on the ability of cargos to be transported across the nuclear envelope. Without a clear connection between attachment of a phosphate moiety and biological response, it is difficult to fully understand and predict how phosphorylation regulates nucleocytoplasmic trafficking. In this review, we will recapitulate clue findings in the field and provide some general rules on how reversible phosphorylation can affect the nuclear-cytoplasmic localization of substrates. This is only now beginning to emerge as a key regulatory step in biology.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Jonathan D Nardozzi et al.</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>Regulation of energy stores and feeding by neuronal and peripheral CREB activity in Drosophila.</title>
<link>http://jdc.jefferson.edu/bmpfp/29</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://jdc.jefferson.edu/bmpfp/29</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 12:35:07 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>The cAMP-responsive transcription factor CREB functions in adipose tissue and liver to regulate glycogen and lipid metabolism in mammals. While Drosophila has a homolog of mammalian CREB, dCREB2, its role in energy metabolism is not fully understood. Using tissue-specific expression of a dominant-negative form of CREB (DN-CREB), we have examined the effect of blocking CREB activity in neurons and in the fat body, the primary energy storage depot with functions of adipose tissue and the liver in flies, on energy balance, stress resistance and feeding behavior. We found that disruption of CREB function in neurons reduced glycogen and lipid stores and increased sensitivity to starvation. Expression of DN-CREB in the fat body also reduced glycogen levels, while it did not affect starvation sensitivity, presumably due to increased lipid levels in these flies. Interestingly, blocking CREB activity in the fat body increased food intake. These flies did not show a significant change in overall body size, suggesting that disruption of CREB activity in the fat body caused an obese-like phenotype. Using a transgenic CRE-luciferase reporter, we further demonstrated that disruption of the adipokinetic hormone receptor, which is functionally related to mammalian glucagon and beta-adrenergic signaling, in the fat body reduced CRE-mediated transcription in flies. This study demonstrates that CREB activity in either neuronal or peripheral tissues regulates energy balance in Drosophila, and that the key signaling pathway regulating CREB activity in peripheral tissue is evolutionarily conserved.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Koichi Iijima et al.</author>


<category>Aging</category>

<category>Animals</category>

<category>Cyclic AMP Response Element-Binding Protein</category>

<category>Drosophila Proteins</category>

<category>Drosophila melanogaster</category>

<category>Energy Metabolism</category>

<category>Fat Body</category>

<category>Feeding Behavior</category>

<category>Gene Knockdown Techniques</category>

<category>Glycogen</category>

<category>Lipid Metabolism</category>

<category>Neurons</category>

<category>Oxidative Stress</category>

<category>Receptors, Glucagon</category>

<category>Response Elements</category>

<category>Starvation</category>

<category>Stress, Physiological</category>

<category>Trans-Activators</category>

<category>Transcription, Genetic</category>

</item>






<item>
<title>Mitochondrial mislocalization underlies Abeta42-induced neuronal dysfunction in a Drosophila model of Alzheimer&apos;s disease.</title>
<link>http://jdc.jefferson.edu/bmpfp/28</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://jdc.jefferson.edu/bmpfp/28</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 11:43:46 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>The amyloid-beta 42 (Abeta42) is thought to play a central role in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease (AD). However, the molecular mechanisms by which Abeta42 induces neuronal dysfunction and degeneration remain elusive. Mitochondrial dysfunctions are implicated in AD brains. Whether mitochondrial dysfunctions are merely a consequence of AD pathology, or are early seminal events in AD pathogenesis remains to be determined. Here, we show that Abeta42 induces mitochondrial mislocalization, which contributes to Abeta42-induced neuronal dysfunction in a transgenic Drosophila model. In the Abeta42 fly brain, mitochondria were reduced in axons and dendrites, and accumulated in the somata without severe mitochondrial damage or neurodegeneration. In contrast, organization of microtubule or global axonal transport was not significantly altered at this stage. Abeta42-induced behavioral defects were exacerbated by genetic reductions in mitochondrial transport, and were modulated by cAMP levels and PKA activity. Levels of putative PKA substrate phosphoproteins were reduced in the Abeta42 fly brains. Importantly, perturbations in mitochondrial transport in neurons were sufficient to disrupt PKA signaling and induce late-onset behavioral deficits, suggesting a mechanism whereby mitochondrial mislocalization contributes to Abeta42-induced neuronal dysfunction. These results demonstrate that mislocalization of mitochondria underlies the pathogenic effects of Abeta42 in vivo.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Kanae Iijima-Ando et al.</author>


<category>Aging</category>

<category>Alzheimer Disease</category>

<category>Amyloid beta-Peptides</category>

<category>Animals</category>

<category>Axons</category>

<category>Behavior, Animal</category>

<category>Brain</category>

<category>Cyclic AMP</category>

<category>Cyclic AMP-Dependent Protein Kinases</category>

<category>Dendrites</category>

<category>Disease Models, Animal</category>

<category>Drosophila melanogaster</category>

<category>Humans</category>

<category>Locomotion</category>

<category>Mitochondria</category>

<category>Neurons</category>

<category>Peptide Fragments</category>

<category>Phosphoproteins</category>

<category>Protein Transport</category>

<category>Substrate Specificity</category>

</item>






<item>
<title>Asymmetric deactivation of HIV-1 gp41 following fusion inhibitor binding.</title>
<link>http://jdc.jefferson.edu/bmpfp/27</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://jdc.jefferson.edu/bmpfp/27</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 12:56:51 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>Both equilibrium and nonequilibrium factors influence the efficacy of pharmaceutical agents that target intermediate states of biochemical reactions. We explored the intermediate state inhibition of gp41, part of the HIV-1 envelope glycoprotein complex (Env) that promotes viral entry through membrane fusion. This process involves a series of gp41 conformational changes coordinated by Env interactions with cellular CD4 and a chemokine receptor. In a kinetic window between CD4 binding and membrane fusion, the N- and C-terminal regions of the gp41 ectodomain become transiently susceptible to inhibitors that disrupt Env structural transitions. In this study, we sought to identify kinetic parameters that influence the antiviral potency of two such gp41 inhibitors, C37 and 5-Helix. Employing a series of C37 and 5-Helix variants, we investigated the physical properties of gp41 inhibition, including the ability of inhibitor-bound gp41 to recover its fusion activity once inhibitor was removed from solution. Our results indicated that antiviral activity critically depended upon irreversible deactivation of inhibitor-bound gp41. For C37, which targets the N-terminal region of the gp41 ectodomain, deactivation was a slow process that depended on chemokine receptor binding to Env. For 5-Helix, which targets the C-terminal region of the gp41 ectodomain, deactivation occurred rapidly following inhibitor binding and was independent of chemokine receptor levels. Due to this kinetic disparity, C37 inhibition was largely reversible, while 5-Helix inhibition was functionally irreversible. The fundamental difference in deactivation mechanism points to an unappreciated asymmetry in gp41 following inhibitor binding and impacts the development of improved fusion inhibitors and HIV-1 vaccines. The results also demonstrate how the activities of intermediate state inhibitors critically depend upon the final disposition of inhibitor-bound states.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Kristen M Kahle et al.</author>


<category>Carrier Proteins</category>

<category>Cell Fusion</category>

<category>HIV Envelope Protein gp41</category>

<category>HIV Fusion Inhibitors</category>

<category>Humans</category>

<category>Kinetics</category>

<category>Peptides</category>

<category>Protein Binding</category>

<category>Protein Conformation</category>

<category>Virus Internalization</category>

</item>






<item>
<title>Mechanism of N-methylation by the tRNA m1G37 methyltransferase Trm5.</title>
<link>http://jdc.jefferson.edu/bmpfp/26</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://jdc.jefferson.edu/bmpfp/26</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2011 08:21:01 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>Trm5 is a eukaryal and archaeal tRNA methyltransferase that catalyzes methyl transfer from S-adenosylmethionine (AdoMet) to the N(1) position of G37 directly 3' to the anticodon. While the biological role of m(1)G37 in enhancing translational fidelity is well established, the catalytic mechanism of Trm5 has remained obscure. To address the mechanism of Trm5 and more broadly the mechanism of N-methylation to nucleobases, we examined the pH-activity profile of an archaeal Trm5 enzyme, and performed structure-guided mutational analysis. The data reveal a marked dependence of enzyme-catalyzed methyl transfer on hydrogen ion equilibria: the single-turnover rate constant for methylation increases by one order of magnitude from pH 6.0 to reach a plateau at pH 7.0. This suggests a mechanism involving proton transfer from G37 as the key element in catalysis. Consideration of the kinetic data in light of the Trm5-tRNA-AdoMet ternary cocrystal structure, determined in a precatalytic conformation, suggests that proton transfer is associated with an induced fit rearrangement of the complex that precedes formation of the reactive configuration in the active site. Key roles for the conserved R145 side chain in stabilizing a proposed oxyanion at G37-O(6), and for E185 as a general base to accept the proton from G37-N(1), are suggested based on the mutational analysis.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Thomas Christian et al.</author>


<category>Catalysis</category>

<category>Catalytic Domain</category>

<category>Methanococcus</category>

<category>Methylation</category>

<category>Models, Biological</category>

<category>Models, Molecular</category>

<category>Molecular Conformation</category>

<category>RNA, Transfer</category>

<category>S-Adenosylmethionine</category>

<category>Substrate Specificity</category>

<category>tRNA Methyltransferases</category>

</item>






<item>
<title>Protein modification by arginylation</title>
<link>http://jdc.jefferson.edu/bmpfp/24</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://jdc.jefferson.edu/bmpfp/24</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2011 10:57:47 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>The modification of protein by arginine catalyzed by arginyltransferases (ATE1) described by the Kashina group in this issue shows that arginylation of protein occurs widely in biology and is being recognized as a key regulatory reaction such as phosphorylation of proteins (Wang et al., 2011).</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Hideko Kaji et al.</author>


</item>





</channel>
</rss>
